Freethinker.nl

Bonjour schreef:You don't learn fast, do you?

This is a different color warning. A severe one. No discussion on this remark is allowed here. You can complain in the 'klachten' topic. http://www.freethinker.nl/forum/viewforum.php?f=7

is that is how you maintain your fools paradise ? in which pack of all dead horse(s) is maintained right ?

Erik schreef:

rana schreef:go ahead and do it now.

No I will not!
You show me the evidence for your claim.
My ability to recall whatever has nothing to do with your claim, let alone proof it.

By the way, you're a fallacy collector.

and you are an such rascal pig who will never admit this thing that i cant recall anything at all.

so what is meaning in beating the dead horse(s) like you ? simply waste of time. ( that is all.)

Zeer onvruchtbare "discussie".

So no evidence then, that's ok, I thought so!
Then the conclusion has to be it is just a fantasy.

Rana is throwing in his own glasses . I think it's a goodbye.

dikkemick schreef:Rana is throwing in his own glasses . I think it's a goodbye.

I think he can't help himself for he is not able to remember what he wrote just a second ago.
It's so sad.

Erik schreef:Zeer onvruchtbare "discussie".

So no evidence then, that's ok, I thought so!
Then the conclusion has to be it is just a fantasy.

evidence is Just as you can *judge* whether rice is properly cooked by picking out one small grain,

so its practical that you cant recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

that means you also cant recall evreything which you have thought or done on each second within your whole hour, day, week, month, year or your whole life. and in same way you already forgot your past life and what to speak even about present life ?

same reason Just as you can *judge* whether rice is properly cooked by picking out one small grain,

so evidence is law of forgetfullness which is practical cuz you cant recall anything at all

It appears that one can forget in one second what someone is telling someone in a lot of clear senteces.
This message is cleared from indecent constructions.
Rana, you have an official warning. Three warnings and you're out.
Bonjour

I think there is something wrong with you.
So I will leave it at this.

rewrite this
Bonjour

evidence is Just as you can *judge* whether rice is properly cooked by picking out one small grain,

Evidence concerning cooked rice is this: http://didyouknow.org/celsius/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and this: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/boili ... d_926.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But I think you're not interested in facts of evidence.

dikkemick schreef:

evidence is Just as you can *judge* whether rice is properly cooked by picking out one small grain,

Evidence concerning cooked rice is this: http://didyouknow.org/celsius/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and this: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/boili ... d_926.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But I think you're not interested in facts of evidence.

so are you able to recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute or not ?

what is your answer ? yes or no

Dear Rana,
The game goes as follows: I ask a question, you answer it.
You ask a question, I answer it. etc. That's called a discussion.

My question was: What are you proposing here? What's your message? Please explain in one (clear!) sentence what your goal is, your idea? What's it you want us to know? What knowlegde can you share with us?
Am I clear this way? Do you understand the question?

dikkemick schreef:Dear Rana,
The game goes as follows: I ask a question, you answer it.
You ask a question, I answer it. etc. That's called a discussion.

My question was: What are you proposing here? What's your message? Please explain in one (clear!) sentence what your goal is, your idea? What's it you want us to know? What knowlegde can you share with us?
Am I clear this way? Do you understand the question?

i have clearly explained everything in practical explanation ( main post in the first page in this thread ) so next question is this that did you read that main post ( practical explanation ) or not ? what is your answer ? ( yes or no ? )

May I shorten your introduction to one claim?
Reincarnation exists?
In that case: I don't believe that because I don't have enough proof, evidence or indications. I think your claim is no better than the claim, there's heaven and there's hell.
I think when you make such claims you have to substantiate them. The fact that I can't remember everything isn't proof. It's only proof that I can;t remember everything.

Look at a (random) documentary to see how the great questions need to be answered.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/extraord ... -einstein/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

dikkemick schreef:May I shorten your introduction to one claim?
Reincarnation exists?
In that case: I don't believe that because I don't have enough proof, evidence or indications. I think your claim is no better than the claim, there's heaven and there's hell.
I think when you make such claims you have to substantiate them. The fact that I can't remember everything isn't proof. It's only proof that I can;t remember everything.

then Why we should waste our time talking with such foolish men? "I don't believe." No You believe or not believe; fact is fact. You are going to be old man. If you say "I don't believe," then is that a very good proposition? It does not depend on your believing or not believing. The nature's course will take place.

That will go on. What is there in your believing and not believing? If you keep yourself in such darkness that "If you believe, then it is fact," then you are a fool, rascal. If you depend only on your belief, then you are a fool.

What is the meaning of your belief?